Communications Essay about Running a Night Club

Communications about Running a Night Club - Essay Example existing for such a business, however the disadvantage could be that there will be a higher level of competition for the business that is proposed to be set up. Another issue that needs to be considered is the question of overheads. Some very popular nightclubs in Dublin, such as the Bodytonic, actually started off in a small sweaty basement, but it is now a thriving nightclub with many branches. Therefore, starting off small appears to be a better business proposition because it would keep the overhead costs down. There would be lower maintenance expenses, because it could be started in the basement of a private house and can later be expanded after it starts making money. Since the private house in question may be a little out of the way, it may be necessary to carefully advertise the opening of the new business and to post signs and directions to reach the nightclub. This could be done using some cheap form of advertisement, such as flyers or word of mouth rather than incurring a great deal of expense for advertising in the well known magazines. Some large arrows and hand written signs strategically placed could also serve to provide the right directions, so that the party crowd can move from the general nightclub area to the proposed establishment. One of the most important factors that must be taken into consideration is the current recessionary atmosphere, where most businesses are struggling to pull in enough customers to sustain their expenses. Therefore, the club fees may need to be low at first, so that it encourages people to come and sample the music. If the advertised entry fees are lower than what is available at other clubs, it would provide an incentive for customers to choose the new establishment instead. Also, other promotional measures may need to be considered, such as for example, allowing free entry for a partner, so that this encourages couples to come to the new nightclub rather than patronizing the already existing ones. Another

Analysis & Critique of Canadian Court System Essay

Analysis & Critique of Canadian Court System - Essay Example These models are the inquisitorial and the adversary models. The Canadian Court System mostly applies the adversarial process in its legal processes. Adversarial justice system is the best approach to addressing justice and equality in court systems and the Canadian Courts should continue using it. Reasons for the Adversary Justice System The ultimate concern of the adversary court system is to ensure equal treatment between the prosecution and defense. The court assumes a neutral position and acts as referee between the two parties. This system requires all parties to adhere to the law in responding to different issues in the court. For instance, police officers must use the procedures that the law accepts to obtain evidence from suspects or the accused. The court will determine whether the police used the appropriate ways of gathering evidence that are recognized by the law and are free from deception and other malpractices. The neutral state of the court ensures a fair trial for t he accused (see Law Commission). Adversary system stresses on strict observance of the law in seeking justice for all parties involved in a case. This characteristic gives the system an added advantage over the inquisitorial justice system. Inquisitorial justice system involves the court in determining facts and evidence about a case. Therefore, the system gives room for bias where the court can favor one side of the case. This is unlike the adversary system that advocates for observance of the law in determining facts about a case. Moreover, the inquisitorial system denies the accused the right of privacy. The system requires the accused to collaborate with the police and other court officials in the process of gathering evidence. The accused has no right of remaining silent throughout the process unlike in the adversary system where the accused has the right of choosing to remain silent throughout the court process. Courts in the adversary justice system act as supervisors of the actions of the prosecution and the accused and eliminate any practices that conflict with the law. The system does not grant the court the authority of supporting the prosecution against the accused. This form of fairness does not exist in the inquisitorial justice system. It is possible for the authority or the police to coerce their authority on the accused in their attempt to gather evidence against him or her. The law does not allow use of evidence that is a result of coercion of authority. Police officers are known to use excessive power in their attempt to gather evidence against victims of crime. Therefore, involving the court and the police in the process is not in the best interests of ensuring equal and just treatment for offenders (see Prasad). The adversary system becomes even stronger when looking at emerging trends in the field of law. For instance, there have been efforts to introduce the system of restorative justice in the court process. Restorative justice is an em erging trend in the court system where victims and offenders interact in the process of seeking justice. Legal procedures are not the basic requirements of punishing an offender under restorative justice. Instead, the offender must take absolute responsibility for his or her actions by convincing the victims that he or she will not repeat such an offense in the future. The system does not recognize the state as an agent that feels the effect of law breaking. It holds the notion that actions of offenders